Ex Parte Herman Brent Brooks v. the State of Texas
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-24-00234-CR
EX PARTE HERMAN BRENT BROOKS ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
July 16, 2024
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before QUINN, C.J., and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.
Herman Brent Brooks, proceeding pro se, filed a document with this Court requesting release from the Hockley County Detention Center after his arrest for “burglary of a building.” We have construed the document as a pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus.
Intermediate courts of appeals do not have original habeas corpus jurisdiction in criminal law matters. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(d) (limiting original habeas jurisdiction of intermediate appellate courts to civil cases); Ex parte Hawkins, 885 S.W.2d 586, 588–89 (Tex. App.—El Paso 1994, orig. proceeding) (per curiam). That jurisdiction instead rests with the Court of Criminal Appeals, the district courts, and the county courts.
See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. arts. 11.05, 11.08, 11.09; Ex parte Hawkins, 885 S.W.2d at 588.
Consequently, we dismiss Brooks’s application for writ of habeas corpus for want of jurisdiction.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ex Parte Herman Brent Brooks v. the State of Texas (Ex Parte Herman Brent Brooks v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.