Ex Parte Henry Earl Ester
This text of Ex Parte Henry Earl Ester (Ex Parte Henry Earl Ester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 13, 2021.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-19-00555-CR
EX PARTE HENRY EARL ESTER
On Appeal from the 230th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1516620
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an attempted appeal of the trial court’s June 27, 2019 denial of pretrial habeas-corpus relief. After filing his application for a writ of habeas corpus on March 29, 2919, appellant entered a plea of true to the State’s motion to adjudicate guilt, which the trial court granted and imposed sentence of imprisonment for three years on June 27, 2019.
A habeas-corpus applicant must be illegally restrained to be entitled to relief. Ex Parte Weise, 55 S.W.3d 617, 619 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001). When appellant entered a plea of true to the State’s motion adjudicating guilt, his habeas-corpus proceeding was rendered moot. When the premise of a habeas-corpus application is destroyed by subsequent developments, the legal issues raised thereunder are rendered moot. Saucedo v. State, 795 S.W.2d 8, 9 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1990, no writ). On June 16, 2021, this court transmitted notice to all parties of the court’s intent to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Appellant has not responded.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
Panel Consists of Justices Wise, Jewell, and Spain.
Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ex Parte Henry Earl Ester, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-henry-earl-ester-texapp-2021.