Ex Parte Henion

55 P. 326, 6 Cal. Unrep. 182
California Supreme Court·Decided December 5, 1898·No. Cr. No. 505·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus. At the hearing, it was shown that the petitioner was not in fact suffering imprisonment, and that the case was in its nature a moot case, by which a speedy decision was sought to be obtained upon the question of the validity of an ordinance of Solano county. Moreover, it was shown that the alleged imprisonment of petitioner would this day come to an .end, and the judgment be fully executed by lapse of time. The business of this court between bona fide litigants is of altogether too great a magnitude to warrant or even to excuse us in pretending moot cases. The writ is discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex Parte Henion, 55 P. 326, 6 Cal. Unrep. 182 (Cal. 1898).

55 P. 326 (Ex Parte Henion) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex parte Rubly
261 S.W.2d 4 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1953)