Ex parte Haywood

5 Cow. 19
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1825
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 5 Cow. 19 (Ex parte Haywood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex parte Haywood, 5 Cow. 19 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1825).

Opinion

The Court were clearly of this opinion.

They said the cases cited went upon the construction of the 17th, 18th, and 19th sections of the act of 1818; but the provisions of the act of 1824 are materially different. The 38th section provides expressly, that all issues in law upon appeal shall be tried by the Court; and all issues of fact by a jury. The pleadings are in all cases to be the same as those before the Justice. There can be no mistake, therefore, as to the intention of the legislature, that an appeal is the remedy in all cases, whether the judgment be upon an issue of law or of fact. Let an alternative mandamus go.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

(PS) Iorg v. United States
E.D. California, 2019
Miller v. Miller
25 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 507 (New York Supreme Court, 1879)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Cow. 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-haywood-nysupct-1825.