Ex Parte Haynes

Supreme Court of Alabama

Ex Parte Haynes

30 So. 3d 436, 2009 Ala. LEXIS 204, 2009 WL 2841118

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided September 4, 2009·No. 1081171·Published

Opinion

*437 SHAW, Justice.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied.

In denying the petition for the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Civil Appeals’ opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT DENIED.

COBB, C.J., and LYONS, WOODALL, STUART, SMITH, BOLIN, PARKER, and MURDOCK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*437 SHAW, Justice.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied.

In denying the petition for the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Civil Appeals’ opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT DENIED.

COBB, C.J., and LYONS, WOODALL, STUART, SMITH, BOLIN, PARKER, and MURDOCK, JJ., concur.

Ex Parte Haynes, 30 So. 3d 436, 2009 Ala. LEXIS 204, 2009 WL 2841118 (Ala. 2009).

Pincite

30 So. 3d 436 (Ex Parte Haynes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related