Ex Parte: Haxan Waldell Palmer
This text of Ex Parte: Haxan Waldell Palmer (Ex Parte: Haxan Waldell Palmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed and Opinion Filed January 13, 2022
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00953-CR No. 05-21-00954-CR
EX PARTE HAXAN WALDELL PALMER
On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. W18-58281-T(B) & W18-58280-T(C)
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Molberg, and Garcia Opinion by Justice Molberg Haxan Waldell Palmer has filed a notice of appeal attempting to appeal from
the trial court’s alleged inaction on an application for writ of habeas corpus he has
filed pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. Appellant
requests that the Court order the trial court to conduct a hearing on the writ
application.
Appellant was convicted in the underlying cases and sentenced to seven years’
imprisonment. See Palmer v. State, No. 05-21-00046-CR, 2021 WL 423169 (Tex.
App.—Dallas Feb. 8, 2021, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication). After
a final felony conviction, the court of criminal appeals has exclusive authority to grant post-conviction habeas relief. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 5; Bd.
of Pardons and Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Ct. of Appeals for Eighth Dist., 910 S.W.2d
481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam).
Only the court of criminal appeals has jurisdiction to order a trial court to rule
on a pending article 11.07 writ application. Padieu v. Ct. of Appeals of Tex., Fifth
Dist., 392 S.W.3d 115, 117–18 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013); see also In re Ward, No.
12-15-00142-CR, 2015 WL 3505189, at *1 (Tex App.—Tyler June 3, 2015, orig.
proceeding) (mem. op.) (not designated for publication). The Court requested
appellant file a letter brief to explain the basis for the Court’s jurisdiction, but he did
not respond to the Court’s request.
Concluding we lack jurisdiction to review this article 11.07 writ proceeding,
we dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction.
/Ken Molberg// 210953f.p05 KEN MOLBERG 210954f.p05 JUSTICE
–2– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
EX PARTE HAXAN WALDELL On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial PALMER District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. W18-58281- No. 05-21-00953-CR T(B). Opinion delivered by Justice Molberg. Justices Myers and Garcia participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.
Judgment entered this 13th day of January, 2022.
–3– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
EX PARTE HAXAN WALDELL On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial PALMER District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. W18-58280- No. 05-21-00954-CR T(C). Opinion delivered by Justice Molberg. Justices Myers and Garcia participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.
–4–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ex Parte: Haxan Waldell Palmer, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-haxan-waldell-palmer-texapp-2022.