Ex parte Hawley

24 Ark. 596
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedJune 15, 1867
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 24 Ark. 596 (Ex parte Hawley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex parte Hawley, 24 Ark. 596 (Ark. 1867).

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Walker

delivered the opinion of the court

We have given to the voluminous record in this case as careful a. consideration as our engagements in other duties would permit, and the state of the record may require; and although much inclined to the opinion that no substantial injustice has been done in the proceedings of the court below, we would not refuse to grant the appeal, and upon argument and authority more thoroughly investigate the case, if there had been any final decree from which an appeal could be taken. But upon looking into the record, we find that the party seeks his appeal upon the order dissolving his injunction, leaving the merits of the controversy. undetermined. This is not such final decree from which an appeal would lie, as held by this court in Moss vs. Ashbrooks, 13 Ark, 176.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Flanagan v. Drainage District No. 17
2 S.W.2d 70 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1928)
Mallett v. Hampton
126 S.W. 92 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 Ark. 596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-hawley-ark-1867.