Ex Parte Harris

375 S.W.2d 453, 1964 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 856
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 19, 1964
Docket36596
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 375 S.W.2d 453 (Ex Parte Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Harris, 375 S.W.2d 453, 1964 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 856 (Tex. 1964).

Opinion

MORRISON, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the 34th Judicial District Court of El Paso County remanding relator to the custody of the Sheriff of said County for delivery to an agent of the State of Louisiana. There are no formal bills of exception and no brief has been filed.

At the hearing the respondent offered the executive warrant of the Governor of Texas authorizing the arrest and return of relator to the State of Louisiana, upon demand of the Governor of that State, for violation of his probation. The supporting papers were introduced.

Relator testified that financial difficulties had prevented him from complying with the condition of his probation directing him to make child support payments.

We have concluded that the trial court was authorized to conclude as he did and remand relator for extradition. Ex parte Eremo, 158 Tex.Cr.R. 532, 257 S.W.2d 712.

We find no merit in relator’s contention that the warrant issued by the Governor of Texas is vague and indefinite and does not apprise relator of the crime of which he is accused. The warrant stated that the relator “stands charged by affidavit before the proper authorities, with the crime of being a fugitive from justice, having violated his probation” and thereby *454 sufficiently described the offense with which he was charged.

Relator's contention that the offense with which he is charged is a misdemeanor and therefore not an offense for which he could be extradited is also without merit. In Ex parte Estep, 161 Tex.Cr.R. 247, 276 S.W.2d 284, this Court held that the phrase “or other crime” in Section 2 of Art. 1008a, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., Uniform Criminal Extradition Act, included misdemeanors.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moyers v. State
948 S.W.2d 359 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1997)
Cronauer v. State
322 S.E.2d 862 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1985)
Ex Parte Williams
622 S.W.2d 482 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1981)
Ex Parte Leach
478 S.W.2d 471 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1972)
Ex parte Smith
410 S.W.2d 638 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
375 S.W.2d 453, 1964 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-harris-texcrimapp-1964.