Ex Parte Harris

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Ex Parte Harris

1940 OK CR 61, 102 P.2d 614, 69 Okla. Crim. 307, 1940 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 36

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMay 9, 1940

DocketNo. A-9850.

StatusPublished

This text of 1940 OK CR 61 (Ex Parte Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex Parte Harris, 1940 OK CR 61, 102 P.2d 614, 69 Okla. Crim. 307, 1940 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 36 (Okla. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner, S. O. Harris, on April 29, 1940, filed in this court a petition signed and verified by his oath wherein he avers that he is unlawfully restrained of his liberty by C. C. Haivk, sheriff of Pottawatomie county, at and in the common jail of said county, and for the reasons stated therein petitioner prays that a writ of habeas corpus be granted, and that he be discharged.

On May 1st, the respondent filed a demurrer to the petition and the cause was set for hearing on May 2nd, at which time both parties appeared by counsel, and following the arguments the petitioner filed his motion to dismiss the cause. It was thereupon considered and ordered that said motion to dismiss be sustained and the cause be dismissed, and it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner, S. O. Harris, on April 29, 1940, filed in this court a petition signed and verified by his oath wherein he avers that he is unlawfully restrained of his liberty by C. C. Haivk, sheriff of Pottawatomie county, at and in the common jail of said county, and for the reasons stated therein petitioner prays that a writ of habeas corpus be granted, and that he be discharged.

On May 1st, the respondent filed a demurrer to the petition and the cause was set for hearing on May 2nd, at which time both parties appeared by counsel, and following the arguments the petitioner filed his motion to dismiss the cause. It was thereupon considered and ordered that said motion to dismiss be sustained and the cause be dismissed, and it is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1940 OK CR 61, 102 P.2d 614, 69 Okla. Crim. 307, 1940 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-harris-oklacrimapp-1940.