Ex Parte Harduvel

150 So. 808, 25 Ala. App. 561, 1933 Ala. App. LEXIS 182
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 31, 1933
Docket6 Div. 560.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 150 So. 808 (Ex Parte Harduvel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Harduvel, 150 So. 808, 25 Ala. App. 561, 1933 Ala. App. LEXIS 182 (Ala. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By the petition filed and now under consideration, we are called upon to decide whether the product known and called 3.2 beer can be legally sold under' the existing statutes and city ordinances predicated thereon.

By consent of respective parties hereto, and by their joint request, all questions of procedure and other technical questions are to be pretermitted, and the sole question, above stated, be decided upon its merits under the law as it now exists.

From this viewpoint, this court, sitting en banc, has given careful and attentive consideration to the points of decision involved, and we have reached the conclusion that the demurrers to the petition for writ of prohibition are in point and well taken, and said demuiTers are sustained.

The petition and demurrers thereto clearly raise the question above stated. There appears no good reason why we should indulge in an extended discussion.

Demurrer sustained ; writ denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Greenwood v. Abernathy
152 So. 33 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
150 So. 808, 25 Ala. App. 561, 1933 Ala. App. LEXIS 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-harduvel-alactapp-1933.