Ex Parte Harbin
This text of 644 So. 2d 919 (Ex Parte Harbin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiffs petition for the writ of mandamus is denied. Regarding the responsive pleading issue, see Rule 12(a), A.R.Civ.P., and Ex parte United States Gypsum Co., 533 So.2d 557, 559 (Ala.1988). Regarding the issue of recusal, see Ex parte Hunt, 642 So.2d 1060 (Ala.1994); Ex parte Melof, 553 So.2d 554, 557 (Ala.1989); Ex parte Balogun, 516 So.2d 606, 609 (Ala.1987); Matter of Sheffield, 465 So.2d 350, 357 (Ala.1984).
WRIT DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
644 So. 2d 919, 1994 Ala. LEXIS 338, 1994 WL 278566, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-harbin-ala-1994.