Ex Parte Hansen

Supreme Court of Florida

Ex Parte Hansen

192 So. 327, 140 Fla. 804, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1201

DecidedNovember 28, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 192 So. 327 (Ex Parte Hansen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex Parte Hansen, 192 So. 327, 140 Fla. 804, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1201 (Fla. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Alternative writ of mandamus was issued by this Court directed to respondent commanding him (1) to conduct an inquiry into the guardianship of Inga. S. Hansen, an insane person (2) to permit Mrs. Hansen to testify privately at such hearing, (3) consider the matter of removing the guardian of Mrs. Hansen, (4) settling of account between Mrs. Hansen and her guardian, (5) that respondent he required to make his decision in writing and hold the hearing to suit convenience of relator.

There is a motion to quash and a return to the alternative writ. All the pleadings in the cause have been examined and it appears that relator is attempting something in the nature of an intervention in Ex Parte Hansen, 120 Fla. 333, 162 So. 715, after the opinion in said cause has gone down *Page 805 and the chancellor performed the duties required of him. It appears further that all the things attempted are matters purely in the sound discretion of respondent as Circuit Judge and County judge of Volusia County, against neither of whom fraud, neglect of duty, or overreaching is charged. In the opinion last cited, the circuit judge was instructed how to proceed in this matter. He has proceeded to perform his duty as instructed and no error is shown to have been committed. If the estate of Inga S. Hansen is not being properly administered, that fact should be brought to the attention of respondent in a proper proceeding. He has full power to hear and consider the complaint and his is the proper forum in which to litigate such matters.

The motion to quash is granted but without prejudice to apply to the circuit court if desired.

It is so ordered.

TERRELL, C. J., and WHITFIELD, BUFORD and CHAPMAN, J. J., concur.

Justices BROWN and THOMAS not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alternative writ of mandamus was issued by this Court directed to respondent commanding him (1) to conduct an inquiry into the guardianship of Inga. S. Hansen, an insane person (2) to permit Mrs. Hansen to testify privately at such hearing, (3) consider the matter of removing the guardian of Mrs. Hansen, (4) settling of account between Mrs. Hansen and her guardian, (5) that respondent he required to make his decision in writing and hold the hearing to suit convenience of relator.

There is a motion to quash and a return to the alternative writ. All the pleadings in the cause have been examined and it appears that relator is attempting something in the nature of an intervention in Ex Parte Hansen, 120 Fla. 333, 162 So. 715, after the opinion in said cause has gone down *Page 805 and the chancellor performed the duties required of him. It appears further that all the things attempted are matters purely in the sound discretion of respondent as Circuit Judge and County judge of Volusia County, against neither of whom fraud, neglect of duty, or overreaching is charged. In the opinion last cited, the circuit judge was instructed how to proceed in this matter. He has proceeded to perform his duty as instructed and no error is shown to have been committed. If the estate of Inga S. Hansen is not being properly administered, that fact should be brought to the attention of respondent in a proper proceeding. He has full power to hear and consider the complaint and his is the proper forum in which to litigate such matters.

The motion to quash is granted but without prejudice to apply to the circuit court if desired.

It is so ordered.

TERRELL, C. J., and WHITFIELD, BUFORD and CHAPMAN, J. J., concur.

Justices BROWN and THOMAS not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 So. 327, 140 Fla. 804, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-hansen-fla-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack