Ex Parte Hamilton
This text of 376 S.W.2d 575 (Ex Parte Hamilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petitioner filed his application for writ of habeas corpus before the Honorable Max M. Rogers, Judge of the 12th Judicial District, who developed the facts and certified the same to this Court under the terms of Art. 119 Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P.
From the record we determine that relator was convicted in cause No. 41S31 in the Criminal District Court of Harris County on November 25, 1935, for the offense of robbery, and his punishment was assessed at life imprisonment. At the hearing on his application for writ of habeas corpus, relator established that at the time of such trial he was indigent, that he asked the court to appoint counsel to represent him, which request was by the court refused, and that he was forced to trial without counsel.
Under the opinion of the Supreme Court: of the United States in Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792, 9 L.Ed. 799, such conviction is void.
Accordingly, it is ordered that relator be released from his present custody and that he be delivered to the custody of the Sheriff of Harris County to stand trial on the original indictment in said cause No. 41531.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
376 S.W.2d 575, 1964 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-hamilton-texcrimapp-1964.