Ex Parte Hallmark
381 So. 2d 642
Opinion
Ex parte Ann B. HALLMARK.
In re Louie B. HALLMARK
v.
Ann B. HALLMARK.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
Barry N. McCrary, Talladega, for petitioner.
No brief filed for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
WRIT DENIED. NO OPINION.
FAULKNER, JONES, ALMON, SHORES, EMBRY and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, J., dissent.
*643 MADDOX, Justice (dissenting).
I dissent for the same reasons I expressed in my dissent in City of Talladega v. McRae, 375 So.2d 429 (Ala.1979).
TORBERT, C. J., concurs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ex Parte Hallmark, 381 So. 2d 642 (Ala. 1980).
381 So. 2d 642 (Ex Parte Hallmark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ezell v. State
571 So. 2d 1144 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1990)
Hill v. Lyons
550 So. 2d 1004 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1989)
Battle v. Battle
476 So. 2d 109 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1985)
Gamble v. First Alabama Bank
404 So. 2d 688 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1981)
Jasper Community Hospital v. Hyde
397 So. 2d 153 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1981)