Ex Parte Green
161 S.W.2d 102, 144 Tex. Crim. 37, 1942 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 212
Opinions
The appellant is charged by complaint in the County Court with the violation of the liquor laws and this procedure is brought for the purpose of securing his release.
The question raised is identical with that in Ex parte Mary Bell King, No. 22,113, this day passed upon, and the opinion in that case is here referred to and adopted. (143 Texas Grim. Rep., 579.)
For the reasons therein stated, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ex Parte Green, 161 S.W.2d 102, 144 Tex. Crim. 37, 1942 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 212 (Tex. 1942).
161 S.W.2d 102 (Ex Parte Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ex Parte King
160 S.W.2d 255 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1942)
Irish v. State
29 S.W. 778 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1895)
Segars v. State
31 S.W. 370 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1895)
Bowman v. State
40 S.W. 796 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1897)