Ex Parte Green

161 S.W.2d 102, 144 Tex. Crim. 37, 1942 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 212
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 25, 1942
DocketNo. 22114.
StatusPublished

This text of 161 S.W.2d 102 (Ex Parte Green) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Green, 161 S.W.2d 102, 144 Tex. Crim. 37, 1942 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 212 (Tex. 1942).

Opinions

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appellant is charged by complaint in the County Court with the violation of the liquor laws and this procedure is brought for the purpose of securing his release.

The question raised is identical with that in Ex parte Mary Bell King, No. 22,113, this day passed upon, and the opinion in that case is here referred to and adopted. (143 Texas Grim. Rep., 579.)

For the reasons therein stated, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte King
160 S.W.2d 255 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1942)
Irish v. State
29 S.W. 778 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1895)
Segars v. State
31 S.W. 370 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1895)
Bowman v. State
40 S.W. 796 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1897)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
161 S.W.2d 102, 144 Tex. Crim. 37, 1942 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-green-texcrimapp-1942.