Ex parte Goldthwaite
This text of 120 Ala. 481 (Ex parte Goldthwaite) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an application for mandamus to the judge of the thirteenth circuit, commanding him to proceed with the trial of a cause alleged to be pending in his court, wherein Henry Goldthwaite is plaintiff and John Wilson, Jr., Cora Lawrence and Virginia Wilson are defendants. The defendants are nonresidents. No property belonging to them has been attached, or is in gremio legis in the case. No personal service upon them has been had. They have never personally appeared in the case. An appearance of counsel for them was allowed by the court to be withdrawn. It is not sought by the present petition to have that appearance reinstated, or to have the action of the court in regard to it reviewed and revised. But on the record as it stands, with no service constructive or otherwise, and with no appearance, it is sought to have judgment rendered against defendants. The court, in our opinion, properly declined to proceed further with the case, and the application for mandamus must be denied.
By what is said above it is not intended to be intimated that the action of the circuit court in respect of the withdrawal of the appearance would be controlled by this court.
Application denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
120 Ala. 481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-goldthwaite-ala-1898.