Ex parte Goldthwaite

120 Ala. 481
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedNovember 15, 1898
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 120 Ala. 481 (Ex parte Goldthwaite) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex parte Goldthwaite, 120 Ala. 481 (Ala. 1898).

Opinion

McCLELLAN, C. J.

This is an application for mandamus to the judge of the thirteenth circuit, commanding him to proceed with the trial of a cause alleged to be pending in his court, wherein Henry Goldthwaite is plaintiff and John Wilson, Jr., Cora Lawrence and Virginia Wilson are defendants. The defendants are nonresidents. No property belonging to them has been attached, or is in gremio legis in the case. No personal service upon them has been had. They have never personally appeared in the case. An appearance of counsel for them was allowed by the court to be withdrawn. It is not sought by the present petition to have that appearance reinstated, or to have the action of the court in regard to it reviewed and revised. But on the record as it stands, with no service constructive or otherwise, and with no appearance, it is sought to have judgment rendered against defendants. The court, in our opinion, properly declined to proceed further with the case, and the application for mandamus must be denied.

By what is said above it is not intended to be intimated that the action of the circuit court in respect of the withdrawal of the appearance would be controlled by this court.

Application denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex parte City of Mobile
46 So. 766 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
120 Ala. 481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-goldthwaite-ala-1898.