Ex Parte Gertrude Berry

28 S.W. 806, 34 Tex. Crim. 36, 1894 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 199
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided December 12, 1894·No. No. 975.·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Judge.

For the purpose of determining the question as to who should have the care, custody, and control of a minor, a writ of habeas corpus was sued out by the parents, as against the grandparents. Hpon the trial, the custody of the child was awarded to the grandparents, and this appeal prosecuted. Motion to dismiss the appeal is made, upon the ground that this court has no jurisdiction of such appeals. The motion must be sustained. The proceeding, as presented by the record, is a civil action. The jurisdiction of this court attaches on appeal only in criminal causes. This is settled by the Constitution in defining the powers and jurisdiction of this court. We deem it unnecessary to discuss the matter further. Ex Parte Beed, ante, p. 9; Legate v. Legate, 87 Texas, 248.

The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Judges all present and concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex Parte Gertrude Berry, 28 S.W. 806, 34 Tex. Crim. 36, 1894 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 199 (Tex. 1894).

28 S.W. 806 (Ex Parte Gertrude Berry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miller v. State
200 S.W. 389 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1917)
Finney v. Walker
144 S.W. 679 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1912)
Ex Parte Wolters
144 S.W. 531 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1911)
Ex Parte Bessie Calvin
48 S.W. 518 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1898)
Telschek v. Fritsch
38 Tex. Crim. 43 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1897)