Ex Parte George Fox

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Ex Parte George Fox

1920 OK CR 76, 188 P. 889, 17 Okla. Crim. 710, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 69

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 15, 1920

DocketNo. A-3731.

StatusPublished

This text of 1920 OK CR 76 (Ex Parte George Fox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex Parte George Fox, 1920 OK CR 76, 188 P. 889, 17 Okla. Crim. 710, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 69 (Okla. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

MATSON, J.

Petitioner, George Fox, alleges that he is unlawfully restrained of his liberty by the sheriff of Noble county, Okla., on the charge of rape in the* first degree, alleged to have been committed-in said county upon one May Perdue during the month of July, 1919, and 'that at a preliminary examination the petitioner was held without bail and committed lo the comity jail of said county to await the action of the district court, and that thereafter petitioner prayed that bail be fixed by tlie district judge of Noble county, and that bail was refused by said district judge 'in said cause; and petitioner further alleges that he is not guilty of the crime of rape in the first degree, and that the proof of his guilt of said crime is not evident nor .the presumption grea!, as shown- by the testimony taken at the preliminary examination in said cause, a copy of which is attached to the petition. For which reasons, petitioner says he is entitled to be admitted to bail in a reasonable amount, pending the further prosecution of said cause. The court has carefully examined the transcript of the testimony of the witnesses taken at the preliminary examination in this cause and the conclusión D reached that the petitioner is entitled to be-admitted to bail, for the reason that the proof is not evident nor the presumption great that tlie petitioner is guilty of rape in the first degrec-by force, as charged in the preliminary complaint. For such reason. *711 it is the opinion of tlie court that petitioner is entitled to be admitted to bail, and it is ordered and adjudged that the petitioner, George Fox, be admitted to bail in the sum of $8,000 for his appearance in t.lie district court of Noble county, to answer to the charge of rape alleged to have been committed by him on one May Perdue in said county in the month of July, 1919; said bond to be conditioned as provided by law, and to be approved by the court clerk of Noble county, Okla.

DOYLE. P. J., and ARMSTRONG, J.. concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MATSON, J.

Petitioner, George Fox, alleges that he is unlawfully restrained of his liberty by the sheriff of Noble county, Okla., on the charge of rape in the* first degree, alleged to have been committed-in said county upon one May Perdue during the month of July, 1919, and 'that at a preliminary examination the petitioner was held without bail and committed lo the comity jail of said county to await the action of the district court, and that thereafter petitioner prayed that bail be fixed by tlie district judge of Noble county, and that bail was refused by said district judge 'in said cause; and petitioner further alleges that he is not guilty of the crime of rape in the first degree, and that the proof of his guilt of said crime is not evident nor .the presumption grea!, as shown- by the testimony taken at the preliminary examination in said cause, a copy of which is attached to the petition. For which reasons, petitioner says he is entitled to be admitted to bail in a reasonable amount, pending the further prosecution of said cause. The court has carefully examined the transcript of the testimony of the witnesses taken at the preliminary examination in this cause and the conclusión D reached that the petitioner is entitled to be-admitted to bail, for the reason that the proof is not evident nor the presumption great that tlie petitioner is guilty of rape in the first degrec-by force, as charged in the preliminary complaint. For such reason. *711 it is the opinion of tlie court that petitioner is entitled to be admitted to bail, and it is ordered and adjudged that the petitioner, George Fox, be admitted to bail in the sum of $8,000 for his appearance in t.lie district court of Noble county, to answer to the charge of rape alleged to have been committed by him on one May Perdue in said county in the month of July, 1919; said bond to be conditioned as provided by law, and to be approved by the court clerk of Noble county, Okla.

DOYLE. P. J., and ARMSTRONG, J.. concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1920 OK CR 76, 188 P. 889, 17 Okla. Crim. 710, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 69, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-george-fox-oklacrimapp-1920.