Ex Parte Garrett

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Ex Parte Garrett

1930 OK CR 464, 292 P. 1118, 49 Okla. Crim. 51, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 208

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 8, 1930

DocketNo. A-8021.

StatusPublished

This text of 1930 OK CR 464 (Ex Parte Garrett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex Parte Garrett, 1930 OK CR 464, 292 P. 1118, 49 Okla. Crim. 51, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 208 (Okla. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an original proceeding by habeas corpus to be let to bail. Petitioner alleges that she is illegally restrained by the sheriff of Adair county; that she is held upon a charge of murder alleged to have *52 been committed in said county September 25, 1930; that bail has been denied by the committing magistrate and by the district judge of said county; that the proof is not evident nor the presumption great.

An examination of the transcript of the evidence discloses that at the time charged petitioner shot and hilled one Mack Garrett, former husband of petitioner. The killing is admitted. No purpose would be served in reciting the testimony further than to say that, upon a consideration of the entire testimony, the petitioner is not entitled to be admitted to bail.

The petition is therefore denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an original proceeding by habeas corpus to be let to bail. Petitioner alleges that she is illegally restrained by the sheriff of Adair county; that she is held upon a charge of murder alleged to have *52 been committed in said county September 25, 1930; that bail has been denied by the committing magistrate and by the district judge of said county; that the proof is not evident nor the presumption great.

An examination of the transcript of the evidence discloses that at the time charged petitioner shot and hilled one Mack Garrett, former husband of petitioner. The killing is admitted. No purpose would be served in reciting the testimony further than to say that, upon a consideration of the entire testimony, the petitioner is not entitled to be admitted to bail.

The petition is therefore denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1930 OK CR 464, 292 P. 1118, 49 Okla. Crim. 51, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-garrett-oklacrimapp-1930.