Ex Parte Garnett

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Ex Parte Garnett

1918 OK CR 105, 173 P. 373, 14 Okla. Crim. 696, 1918 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 168

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedAugust 19, 1918

DocketNo. A-3997.

StatusPublished

This text of 1918 OK CR 105 (Ex Parte Garnett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex Parte Garnett, 1918 OK CR 105, 173 P. 373, 14 Okla. Crim. 696, 1918 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 168 (Okla. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition filed June 17, 1918, on behalf of Charles H. Garnett alleges in substance that he is unlawfully imprisoned and restrained in the county jail at Stillwater by O. L. Lilley, sheriff of Payne county, by virtue of a commitment issued by the court clerk of said county upon a judgment and sentence imposing a fine of $500, rendered in the district court of said county; that said petitioner gave supersedeas bond pending the perfecting of his appeal to this court, which bond was duly approved and is in full force and effect. An alternative writ issued and petitioner was allowed bail pending answer to the same. On June 27, 1918, the appeal of petitioner was perfected and his application to be allowed bail pending the determination of his appeal was granted. Thereupon the habeas corpus proceeding was dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition filed June 17, 1918, on behalf of Charles H. Garnett alleges in substance that he is unlawfully imprisoned and restrained in the county jail at Stillwater by O. L. Lilley, sheriff of Payne county, by virtue of a commitment issued by the court clerk of said county upon a judgment and sentence imposing a fine of $500, rendered in the district court of said county; that said petitioner gave supersedeas bond pending the perfecting of his appeal to this court, which bond was duly approved and is in full force and effect. An alternative writ issued and petitioner was allowed bail pending answer to the same. On June 27, 1918, the appeal of petitioner was perfected and his application to be allowed bail pending the determination of his appeal was granted. Thereupon the habeas corpus proceeding was dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1918 OK CR 105, 173 P. 373, 14 Okla. Crim. 696, 1918 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-garnett-oklacrimapp-1918.