Ex Parte Garlynn Thibodeaux v. the State of Texas

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-24-00238-CR

EX PARTE GARLYNN THIBODEAUX ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

July 29, 2024

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and YARBROUGH, JJ.

Garlynn Thibodeaux, proceeding pro se, filed a “Motion to Enter Nunc Pro Tunc Order” in this Court seeking post-conviction relief from his final felony conviction. See Thibodeaux v. State, 521 S.W.3d 421, 426 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2017, pet. ref’d) (affirming Thibodeaux’s conviction for unlawful possession of a firearm). We construe the document as an application for writ of habeas corpus.

Intermediate courts of appeals do not have original habeas corpus jurisdiction in criminal law matters. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(d) (limiting original habeas jurisdiction of intermediate appellate courts to civil cases); Ex parte Hawkins, 885 S.W.2d 586, 588–89 (Tex. App.—El Paso 1994, orig. proceeding) (per curiam). That jurisdiction

2

instead rests with the Court of Criminal Appeals, the district courts, and the county courts. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.05; Ex parte Hawkins, 885 S.W.2d at 588. Only the Court of Criminal Appeals has authority to grant post-conviction habeas relief in felony cases. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, § 3(a); Ex parte Alexander, 685 S.W.2d 57, 60 (Tex. Crim. App. 1985).

For these reasons, we dismiss Thibodeaux’s application for writ of habeas corpus for want of jurisdiction. 1 Per Curiam

Do not publish.

1 Thibodeaux may be entitled to habeas relief by filing an application for writ of habeas corpus with

the clerk of the court in which the conviction being challenged was obtained, returnable to the Court of Criminal Appeals. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07.