Ex Parte Gardner
This text of 1933 OK CR 20 (Ex Parte Gardner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petitioner alleges that he is unlawfully restrained of his liberty by the warden of the state penitentiary; that in May, 1913, he was charged in Pottawatomie county with the crime of murder; that he entered a plea of guilty and was sentenced to imprisonment for life; and that he has served since said time. He alleges that before entering his plea of guilty he was made to believe by the county attorney if he would plead guilty he would not receive a sentence of more than five years. That he did not have counsel of his own choosing but relied upon the county attorney, that the court did not advise him of his right to have counsel appointed and did not appoint counsel for him. The state has demurred to the petition. The demurrer must be sustained. The matters alleged do not go- to the jurisdiction of the court and do not render the judgment void. It is so well settled as to amount to a truism that habeas corpus may be resorted to only when the judgment is void and it cannot be resorted *295 to in lieu of an appeal, no matter how flagrant the errors in the proceeding, unless they are such as to render the judgment void.
The writ is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1933 OK CR 20, 19 P.2d 910, 54 Okla. Crim. 294, 1933 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 87, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-gardner-oklacrimapp-1933.