Ex Parte Galloway

96 So. 369, 209 Ala. 469, 1923 Ala. LEXIS 473
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided April 26, 1923·No. 3 Div. 612.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

■ McCLELLAN, j.

Petition for certiorari to review the judgment of reversal entered by the Court of Appeals in the appeal of Day v. Galloway, 96 South. 365. The Court of Appeals held that the trial court erred in giving the general affirmative charge for the plaintiff, appellee. This conclusion involved, necessarily, a finding of fact, to review or revise which this court will not exert its powers or authority through certiorari. Ex parte Steverson, 177 Ala. 384, 389, 58 South. 992; Ex parte Williams, 182 Ala. 34, 37, 62 South. 63; 13 Mich. Ala. Dig. 433. There is presented a nonreviewable question only; and, without passing upon the matter in any way, the writ is denied.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE and THOMAS, JJ->, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex Parte Galloway, 96 So. 369, 209 Ala. 469, 1923 Ala. LEXIS 473 (Ala. 1923).

96 So. 369 (Ex Parte Galloway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Armour Fertilizer Works v. Zills
177 So. 136 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1937)
Ex Parte C. M. McMahen & Sons
106 So. 57 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1925)