Ex Parte Galloway

96 So. 369, 209 Ala. 469, 1923 Ala. LEXIS 473
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedApril 26, 1923
Docket3 Div. 612.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 96 So. 369 (Ex Parte Galloway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Galloway, 96 So. 369, 209 Ala. 469, 1923 Ala. LEXIS 473 (Ala. 1923).

Opinion

■ McCLELLAN, j.

Petition for certiorari to review the judgment of reversal entered by the Court of Appeals in the appeal of Day v. Galloway, 96 South. 365. The Court of Appeals held that the trial court erred in giving the general affirmative charge for the plaintiff, appellee. This conclusion involved, necessarily, a finding of fact, to review or revise which this court will not exert its powers or authority through certiorari. Ex parte Steverson, 177 Ala. 384, 389, 58 South. 992; Ex parte Williams, 182 Ala. 34, 37, 62 South. 63; 13 Mich. Ala. Dig. 433. There is presented a nonreviewable question only; and, without passing upon the matter in any way, the writ is denied.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE and THOMAS, JJ->, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Armour Fertilizer Works v. Zills
177 So. 136 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1937)
Ex Parte C. M. McMahen & Sons
106 So. 57 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 So. 369, 209 Ala. 469, 1923 Ala. LEXIS 473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-galloway-ala-1923.