Ex Parte: Francisco Lesa, III v. the State of Texas
This text of Ex Parte: Francisco Lesa, III v. the State of Texas (Ex Parte: Francisco Lesa, III v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
§ EX PARTE: No. 08-23-00226-CR § FRANCISCO LESA, III. Appeal from the § 399th Judicial District Court § of Bexar County, Texas § (TC# 2023CR1281) §
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This matter comes before us on Appellant Francisco Lesa III’s motion to dismiss.
On March 2, 2023, Lesa was convicted of stalking and sentenced to confinement for ten
years in the Texas Department of Corrections, suspended and probated for ten years with a number
of conditions, including a six-month jail sanction. On the same day, Lesa was taken into custody
to begin serving his jail sanction.
On March 3, 2023, Lesa filed a notice of intent to appeal his conviction, and that appeal is
now pending in this Court under Cause No. 08-23-00109-CR.
On March 8, 2023, Lesa filed a motion for bail, contending that because of the nature of
the crime and sentence in question, he was entitled to release on bail pending the result of his
appeal. On March 14, 2023, the trial court denied the motion. On the same day, Lesa filed a motion to reconsider. On March 16, 2023, the trial court ordered that Lesa be released on a $50,000 bond
with full GPS house arrest, among other conditions.
On March 23, 2023, Lesa filed an application for writ of habeas corpus seeking immediate
release and continuation on pretrial bond, which the record does not reflect was ruled on. On April
10, 2023, Lesa filed a first amended application for writ of habeas corpus seeking immediate
release and a personal recognizance bond, which the trial court denied on April 20, 2023.
On May 1, 2023, Lesa filed a notice of intent to appeal the trial court’s order of April 20,
2023.
On June 12, 2023, the clerk’s record was filed. Lesa states in his motion to dismiss that he
has not yet received a copy of the reporter’s record.
On September 2, 2023, having served six months in jail, Lesa was released from custody.
On September 5, 2023, the Fourth Court of Appeals transferred this case to the Eighth
Court of Appeals.
On September 7, 2023, Lesa filed his motion to dismiss, 1 contending that his release from
confinement rendered the relief sought in this appeal—i.e., his immediate release—moot. We
agree. See Jack v. State, 149 S.W.3d 119, 123 n.10 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004) (“A case becomes
moot on appeal when the judgment of the appellate court can no longer have an effect on an
existing controversy or cannot affect the rights of the parties.”); Chacon v. State, 745 S.W.2d 377,
378 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988) (en banc) (noting that “generally a cause, issue or proposition is or
becomes moot when it does not, or ceases to, rest on any existing fact or right” and an issue is
moot where the court “cannot possibly grant relief”).
1 Both Lesa and his attorney signed the motion to dismiss in accordance with TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a).
2 Accordingly, because the present action is moot, we grant Appellant’s motion and dismiss
this appeal.
LISA J. SOTO, Justice
September 13, 2023
Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ.
(Do Not Publish)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ex Parte: Francisco Lesa, III v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-francisco-lesa-iii-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.