Ex Parte Francis

239 S.W. 967, 91 Tex. Crim. 398, 1922 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 218
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 5, 1922·No. No. 6865.·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinions

HAWKINS, Judge.

—This appears to be an appeal from an order of the District Judge remanding relator without bail. The record is not in condition to show that the jurisdiction of this court has attached. The order of the judge remanding relator is as follows:

“IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF COTTLE COUNTY, TEXAS. IN VACATION.

Ex Parte Alvin Francis.

I am of the opinion that the said Alvin Francis is legally held in custody and under restraint of his liberty by the said respondent, Morgan Wright, Sheriff of Cottle County, Texas.

*399 It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the application of the said Alvin Francis herein he denied and that the said Alvin Francis be and is hereby remanded to the custody of said respondent, Morgan Wright, Sheriff, aforesaid.

J. H. Milan.”

It will be observed from the foregoing order that the hearing was had in vacation. The transcript is certified to by the District Clerk of Cottle County. Article 950, Vernon’s C. C. P. provides that when the proceedings upon habeas corpus take place before the court in session the transcript shall be prepared and certified to by the Clerk; but when had before the judge in vacation, the transcript may be prepared by any person under the direction of the judge and certified ■ by such judge. There is no certificate by the judge as to the correctness of the transcript in the instant case, and to that extent the provisions of Article 950 have not been complied with.

The transcript shows no notice of appeal from the order of the judge remanding relator. Without notice of appeal this court has no jurisdiction to review the proceedings even though the transcript were properly certified to. Ex parte Cates, 89 Texas Crim. Rep. 504; Ex parte Shearman, 89 Texas Crim. Rep. 341.

For the reasons stated the appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex Parte Francis, 239 S.W. 967, 91 Tex. Crim. 398, 1922 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 218 (Tex. 1922).

239 S.W. 967 (Ex Parte Francis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Urrutia v. State
668 S.W.2d 885 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1984)
Ex Parte Noe
646 S.W.2d 230 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1983)
Ex Parte Bland
214 S.W.2d 794 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1948)
Ex Parte Williams
111 S.W.2d 266 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1937)
Ex parte Harris
16 S.W.2d 1085 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1929)
Ex parte Turner
296 S.W. 295 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1927)
Ex Parte Wm. Cuaron
274 S.W. 610 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1925)
Ex Parte Jones Polk
268 S.W. 464 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1925)
Ex Parte W.L. Crawford
265 S.W. 906 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1924)
Ex parte Crawford
265 S.W. 906 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1924)