Ex Parte Flannery

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Ex Parte Flannery

1926 OK CR 359, 249 P. 1117, 35 Okla. Crim. 202, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 359

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedOctober 12, 1926

DocketNo. A-6400.

StatusPublished

This text of 1926 OK CR 359 (Ex Parte Flannery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex Parte Flannery, 1926 OK CR 359, 249 P. 1117, 35 Okla. Crim. 202, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 359 (Okla. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition filed Oct. 4, 1926, on behalf of Laurence S. Flannery, who had been arrested by Ben Dancy, sheriff of Oklahoma county, and held under a warrant issued by the Governor for his return to the state of Illinois upon a requisition from the Gov *203 ernor of that state, alleging that he is a fugitive from justice, having been charged by three indictments returned by the grand jury of Macon county, Ill., with the larceny of $3,500, the property of one Mary E. Brennen. It is further alleged that said indictments do not state facts sufficient to constitute an offense against any law of the state of Illinois, and that petitioner is not a fugitive from justice. The writ of habeas corpus issued, returnable before the court October 7th, at which time all the parties appeared. The respondent filed a motion to' quash the writ on the ground that the petition upon which the said writ was issued does not state facts sufficient to entitle petitioner to the relief prayed for, which motion was by counsel for petitioner confessed, and by order of the court sustained, the writ discharged, and petitioner remanded to the custody of Ted B. Hill, agent for the state of Illinois.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition filed Oct. 4, 1926, on behalf of Laurence S. Flannery, who had been arrested by Ben Dancy, sheriff of Oklahoma county, and held under a warrant issued by the Governor for his return to the state of Illinois upon a requisition from the Gov *203 ernor of that state, alleging that he is a fugitive from justice, having been charged by three indictments returned by the grand jury of Macon county, Ill., with the larceny of $3,500, the property of one Mary E. Brennen. It is further alleged that said indictments do not state facts sufficient to constitute an offense against any law of the state of Illinois, and that petitioner is not a fugitive from justice. The writ of habeas corpus issued, returnable before the court October 7th, at which time all the parties appeared. The respondent filed a motion to' quash the writ on the ground that the petition upon which the said writ was issued does not state facts sufficient to entitle petitioner to the relief prayed for, which motion was by counsel for petitioner confessed, and by order of the court sustained, the writ discharged, and petitioner remanded to the custody of Ted B. Hill, agent for the state of Illinois.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1926 OK CR 359, 249 P. 1117, 35 Okla. Crim. 202, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-flannery-oklacrimapp-1926.