Ex Parte Everett James Smith v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 10, 2025·No. 03-25-00458-CR·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-25-00458-CR

Ex parte Everett James Smith

FROM THE 264TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, NO. 25DCR91537, THE HONORABLE PAUL LEPAK, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Everett James Smith seeks appellate review of his pretrial writ of habeas corpus filed in his criminal case. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Art. 11.08; Tex. R. App. Proc. 31. The trial court has certified that Smith’s criminal case “is pending, and the court has made no rulings.” The record reflects that the trial court has not yet ruled on Smith’s pretrial habeas corpus application. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 31.3. To the extent Smith is attempting to file an original pretrial habeas corpus petition arising from his criminal case, it is also dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Ex parte Bhardwaj, 575 S.W.3d 915 (Tex. App.—Waco 2019, no pet.); cf. Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221(d) (providing that court of appeals have original jurisdiction to issue writs of habeas corpus in certain civil cases).

Chief Justice Darlene Byrne

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Crump and Ellis Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction Filed: July 10, 2025 Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex Parte Everett James Smith v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Ex Parte Everett James Smith v. the State of Texas (Ex Parte Everett James Smith v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Tarun Bhardwaj
575 S.W.3d 915 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2019)