Ex Parte Everett James Smith v. the State of Texas
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-25-00458-CR
Ex parte Everett James Smith
FROM THE 264TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, NO. 25DCR91537, THE HONORABLE PAUL LEPAK, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Everett James Smith seeks appellate review of his pretrial writ of habeas corpus filed in his criminal case. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Art. 11.08; Tex. R. App. Proc. 31. The trial court has certified that Smith’s criminal case “is pending, and the court has made no rulings.” The record reflects that the trial court has not yet ruled on Smith’s pretrial habeas corpus application. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 31.3. To the extent Smith is attempting to file an original pretrial habeas corpus petition arising from his criminal case, it is also dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Ex parte Bhardwaj, 575 S.W.3d 915 (Tex. App.—Waco 2019, no pet.); cf. Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221(d) (providing that court of appeals have original jurisdiction to issue writs of habeas corpus in certain civil cases).
Chief Justice Darlene Byrne
Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Crump and Ellis Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction Filed: July 10, 2025 Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ex Parte Everett James Smith v. the State of Texas (Ex Parte Everett James Smith v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.