Ex Parte Evans

129 S.E. 210, 133 S.C. 112, 1925 S.C. LEXIS 33
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided August 13, 1925·Published

Opinion

August 13, 1925

The opinion of the Court was delivered by This is a rule issued out of this Court requiring the mayor, clerk, and treasurer and attorney of the town of Edgefield to show cause why they should not be attached for contempt of court in an alleged disobedience of a certain restraining order issued by Judge DeVore. *Page 122

The circumstances under which Judge DeVore's order was passed are explained in the opinion in the main cause, and need not be repeated.

The return of the respondents to the rule clearly shows that the proceedings claimed by the petitioner to constitute a disobedience of the order of Judge DeVore related to an entirely different road or street on the opposite side of the plaintiff's property from that affected by the former condemnation proceeding.

It is adjudged by this Court that the return is sufficient, and the rule is discharged.

MESSRS. JUSTICES WATTS and MARION, and R.O.

PURDY, A.A.J., concur.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE GARY, disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex Parte Evans, 129 S.E. 210, 133 S.C. 112, 1925 S.C. LEXIS 33 (S.C. 1925).

129 S.E. 210 (Ex Parte Evans) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.