Ex parte Estabrook
284 U.S. 585, 52 S. Ct. 127, 76 L. Ed. 506, 1931 U.S. LEXIS 503
Opinion
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. The motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus is also denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ex parte Estabrook, 284 U.S. 585, 52 S. Ct. 127, 76 L. Ed. 506, 1931 U.S. LEXIS 503 (1931).
284 U.S. 585 (Ex parte Estabrook) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Larsen v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.
374 P.2d 47 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1962)
Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. City of Richmond
33 S.E.2d 795 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1945)
Walling v. Block
139 F.2d 268 (Ninth Circuit, 1943)
Walling v. Goldblatt Bros.
128 F.2d 778 (Seventh Circuit, 1942)
Safeway Stores, Inc. v. City of Portland
42 P.2d 162 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1935)
State Ex Rel. Botkin v. Welsh
251 N.W. 189 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1933)
Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. City of Spartanburg
170 S.E. 273 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1933)