Ex parte Erdmann

26 P. 372, 88 Cal. 579, 1891 Cal. LEXIS 736
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedApril 2, 1891
DocketNo. 20818
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 26 P. 372 (Ex parte Erdmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex parte Erdmann, 26 P. 372, 88 Cal. 579, 1891 Cal. LEXIS 736 (Cal. 1891).

Opinion

The Court.

On February 14, 1890, the petitioner was convicted of a simple assault in Police Court No. 2, of San Francisco, and sentenced, under section 1205 of the Penal Code, to pay a fine of five hundred dollars, and in default of payment to be imprisoned in the county jail at the rate of one day for each dollar until the fine should be satisfied. The maximum of imprisonment for said offense is “not exceeding three months” (Pen. Code, sec. 241), although a fine of five hundred dollars may also be imposed. Under the sentence of fine imposed by the court, petitioner has already been in jail considerably over a year; and he contends that, for the purpose of enforcing the fine, he cannot legally be imprisoned longer than the maximum term of three months.

The question has been presented to us heretofore, when there was some difference of opinion in regard to it. As the legislature, at its recent session, amended said section 1205 so as to expressly provide that imprisonment to enforce a fine must “ not extend, in any case, beyond the term for which the defendant might be sentenced to imprisonment for the offense of which he has been convicted,” we think that former doubts on the subject should, in justice, be resolved in favor of the petitioner.

It is ordered that petitioner Frank Erdmann be discharged from custody.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Kennerly
214 P. 857 (California Supreme Court, 1923)
People v. Rivera
28 P.R. 918 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1920)
Wallace v. White
99 A. 452 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1916)
In Re Holley
69 S.E. 872 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1910)
People v. Puente
14 P.R. 109 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 P. 372, 88 Cal. 579, 1891 Cal. LEXIS 736, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-erdmann-cal-1891.