Ex parte Elwood
This text of 1 Denio 633 (Ex parte Elwood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
held that the judgments in favor of Adams ceased to be liens on the land, after the expiration of fifteen months from the time of the first mentioned sale—that is to say, after the 7th day of September, 1840. After that sale became perfect, all junior liens, where the creditors who held them had not redeemed, were cut off. The owners of these judgments might have redeemed from the purchaser at the first mentioned sale, at any time before that sale had become absolute; but having suffered that time to go by, the lien of their judgments upon that land is extinguished, and the right of redemption, which exists only in favor of a party having a judgment or mortgage [635]*635lien, is gone. A mandamus requiring a conveyance to be executed to Peter Elwood must issue. (2 R. S. 371, § 51.)
Motion granted.
) Ex parte Stevens, (4 Cowen, 133;) Russell v. Allen, (10 Paige, 249.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Denio 633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-elwood-nycterr-1845.