Ex Parte Elmer Davis

318 U.S. 412, 63 S. Ct. 679, 87 L. Ed. 868, 1943 U.S. LEXIS 888
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 8, 1943
StatusPublished
Cited by41 cases

This text of 318 U.S. 412 (Ex Parte Elmer Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Elmer Davis, 318 U.S. 412, 63 S. Ct. 679, 87 L. Ed. 868, 1943 U.S. LEXIS 888 (1943).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

After we denied, without prejudice, petitioner’s previous application for leave to file in this Court a petition for habeas corpus, 317 U. S. 592, the Circuit Court of Vigo County, Indiana, on December 29, 1942, sustained a demurrer to his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. Petitioner now alleges that he has filed an appeal from that court to the Supreme Court of Indiana. He also alleges that his request that a transcript of the coram nobis proceeding be furnished free of charge, because he is a poor person, has been denied. He contends that in the absence of a transcript of the coram nobis proceeding, he is left without a remedy by appeal in the courts of Indiana. But we cannot assume that the Supreme Court of Indiana will refuse to use its process to bring before it such parts of the record as may be necessary for a decision of the case, or that, in that event, it will refuse to enter an order finally disposing of the appeal. Until the Supreme Court of Indiana has acted upon an application for an order finally disposing of the appeal — which, if adverse to petitioner, he could make the subject of a petition for certiorari to this Court — the remedies afforded by state appellate procedure have not been fully exhausted. Accordingly, we deny petitioner’s present application without prejudice.

Leave denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Andrew Johnson v. Catherine Bauman
27 F.4th 384 (Sixth Circuit, 2022)
Williams v. Greco
442 F. Supp. 831 (S.D. New York, 1977)
Clark v. Nickeson
321 F. Supp. 415 (D. Connecticut, 1971)
In re Goss
249 F. Supp. 109 (D. Hawaii, 1966)
Vincent Lee v. State of Kansas
346 F.2d 48 (Tenth Circuit, 1965)
United States ex rel. Pennise v. Fay
210 F. Supp. 275 (S.D. New York, 1962)
People v. Hollander
194 Cal. App. 2d 386 (California Court of Appeal, 1961)
Preston v. Municipal Court
188 Cal. App. 2d 76 (California Court of Appeal, 1961)
In re Ortega
158 F. Supp. 946 (N.D. Illinois, 1957)
Galloway v. Dowd. Witte v. Dowd
204 F.2d 524 (Seventh Circuit, 1953)
Vahlberg v. Turner
113 F. Supp. 398 (W.D. Oklahoma, 1953)
Brown v. Allen
344 U.S. 443 (Supreme Court, 1953)
United States Ex Rel. Almeida v. Baldi
195 F.2d 815 (Third Circuit, 1952)
Scott v. Henslee
104 F. Supp. 218 (E.D. Arkansas, 1952)
Buchanan v. O'Brien
181 F.2d 601 (First Circuit, 1950)
United States Ex Rel. Montgomery v. Ragen
86 F. Supp. 382 (N.D. Illinois, 1949)
United States ex rel. White v. Walsh
174 F.2d 49 (Seventh Circuit, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
318 U.S. 412, 63 S. Ct. 679, 87 L. Ed. 868, 1943 U.S. LEXIS 888, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-elmer-davis-scotus-1943.