Ex parte Eastabrooks
5 Cow. 27
Opinion
The Court said they were very clearly of opinion, that the penalty being more than double the amount of the judgment was no objection ; though its being less, Was so, because it might abridge the rights of the appellee. It may be for his benefit, but cannot possibly injure him, that the bond is for more. And they awarded an alternative mandamus.
Rule accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ex parte Eastabrooks, 5 Cow. 27 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1825).
5 Cow. 27 (Ex parte Eastabrooks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stapleton v. Pease
2 Mont. 508 (Montana Supreme Court, 1876)
Hill v. . Burke
62 N.Y. 111 (New York Court of Appeals, 1875)
Post v. Doremus
3 Thomp. & Cook 626 (New York Supreme Court, 1874)