Ex parte Eager

79 S.W.2d 136, 128 Tex. Crim. 97, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 497
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 21, 1934·No. No. 17310·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinions

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

This is an original application for a writ of habeas corpus by the relator seeking to be released from custody under a judgment for contempt.

It appears from the record that the commitment was issued on a mere verbal order of the judge. A district judge has no authority to commit a person for contempt on a mere verbal [98] order. It is necessary that the proceedings be reduced to writing and made a matter of record in the court. Ex parte Ray, 276 S. W., 709; Ex parte McGraw, 277 S. W., 699. See also 9 , Texas Jur., 632.

It is ordered that the relator be discharged,

Relator discharged.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex parte Eager, 79 S.W.2d 136, 128 Tex. Crim. 97, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 497 (Tex. 1934).

79 S.W.2d 136 (Ex parte Eager) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Supercinski
561 S.W.2d 482 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1977)
Ex Parte Hawkins
545 S.W.2d 599 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1977)
Ex Parte Spencer
508 S.W.2d 698 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1974)
Ex Parte Hardin
344 S.W.2d 152 (Texas Supreme Court, 1961)
Ex Parte Martinez
331 S.W.2d 209 (Texas Supreme Court, 1960)
Ex Parte Jones
294 S.W.2d 111 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1956)
Harbison v. McMurray
163 S.W.2d 680 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1942)