Ex parte Dykes

3 So. 306, 83 Ala. 114
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided December 15, 1887·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

SOMEEYILLE, J.

— Under the testimony set out in,the bill of exceptions, it is the opinion of the court that the applicant is entitled to bail. The proof is not evident, nor the presumption great, from this evidence, that the defendant is guilty of the offense of murder in the degree punished capitally. He is, therefore, entitled to bail. — Ex parte Hammock, 78 Ala. 414; Ex parte Bryant, 36 Ala. 270. Lest we may prejudice the case on its merits, we need go no further than this.

The writs of certiorari and habeas corpus will be awarded, to bring the proceedings and the prisoner before this court, unless the petitioner, when informed of this ruling, is content to renew his application before a court or judgte of primary jurisdiction.

Certiorari and habeas corpus ordered, nisi.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex parte Dykes, 3 So. 306, 83 Ala. 114 (Ala. 1887).

3 So. 306 (Ex parte Dykes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Massey
100 So. 625 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1924)
Ford v. Dilley
174 Iowa 243 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1916)