Ex Parte Dwight Ervine Brown

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 21, 2012
Docket02-12-00515-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Ex Parte Dwight Ervine Brown (Ex Parte Dwight Ervine Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Dwight Ervine Brown, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00515-CR

Ex parte Dwight Ervine Brown § From the 158th District Court

§ of Denton County (F-90-577-B)

§ December 21, 2012

§ Per Curiam

§ (nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for

want of jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00515-CR NO. 02-12-00516-CR NO. 02-12-00517-CR NO. 02-12-00518-CR

EX PARTE DWIGHT ERVINE BROWN

----------

FROM THE 158TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

Appellant Dwight Ervine Brown pleaded guilty pursuant to a plea bargain to

the felony offenses of burglary of a habitation, aggravated robbery, and two

counts of aggravated sexual assault. He subsequently filed an application for

writ of habeas corpus in the trial court “seeking to obtain a copy of his complete

trial records without cost.” The district clerk returned the application to Brown

because it did not comply with rule of appellate procedure 73.1. See Tex. R.

App. P. 73.1 (requiring use of specific form for application for post-conviction

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

2 habeas corpus relief from felony case). In his notice of appeal, Brown stated that

he considered the application denied by operation of law.

As one of our sister courts recently observed,

This court has jurisdiction over criminal appeals only when expressly granted by law. No statute vests this court with jurisdiction over an appeal from an order denying a request for a free copy of the trial record when such a request is not presented in conjunction with a timely filed direct appeal. Furthermore, an intermediate court of appeals has no jurisdiction over post-conviction writs of habeas corpus in felony cases.

Williamson v. State, Nos. 10-12-00146-CR, 10-12-00147-CR, 10-12-00148-CR,

10-12-00149-CR, 2012 WL 2353684, at *1 (Tex. App.—Waco June 13, 2012, no

pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (citations omitted).

On October 29, 2012, we notified Brown of our concern that this court

lacked jurisdiction over these appeals, and we informed him that unless he or

any party desiring to continue the appeals filed with the court, on or before

November 19, 2012, a response showing grounds for continuing the appeals, the

appeals would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3.

We have received no response. Accordingly, we dismiss these appeals for want

of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: December 21, 2012

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ex Parte Dwight Ervine Brown, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-dwight-ervine-brown-texapp-2012.