Ex Parte Dunlap
This text of 311 S.W.2d 413 (Ex Parte Dunlap) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order of the district court of Nueces County refusing to reduce a bond.
Relator stands charged by indictment with the offense of burglary and two prior convictions for felonies less than capital alleged for enhancement.
At the hearing on the writ, relator produced evidence that he was able to make bond in the sum of $1,000.00, but the court *56 refused to reduce a $5,000.00 bond under which he was then being held to that sum but did reduce it to $4,500.00.
It was stipulated that the Federal Bureau of Investigation records in the possession of the district attorney revealed that the relator had previously been convicted of four felonies and had been in the penitentiary for each one of them.
Where bail is reduced on habeas corpus hearing, before complaint can be urged as to the amount so fixed accused must show an effort to furnish bail in that amount. In Ex parte Cascio, 140 Texas Cr. Rep. 288, 144 S.W. 2d 886, a case in which the accused was charged with burglary and two prior convictions of felonies less than capital were alleged for enhancement, this court held that $10,000.00 bail was not excessive as a matter of law. See also Ex parte Alonzo 151 Texas Cr. Rep. 361, 208 S.W. 2d 651, and other cases cited under Bail, Key Number 53, Texas Digest and under Note 3, Article 281, V.A.C.C.P.
We do not find an abuse of discretion on the part of the district judge.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
311 S.W.2d 413, 166 Tex. Crim. 55, 1958 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 4510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-dunlap-texcrimapp-1958.