Ex Parte Dud Steadman Jr.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 1, 2010
Docket14-10-00017-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Ex Parte Dud Steadman Jr. (Ex Parte Dud Steadman Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Dud Steadman Jr., (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 1, 2010.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-10-00017-CV

EX PARTE DUD STEADMAN, JR., Appellant

On Appeal from the 164th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2009-62010

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an attempted appeal from a judgment signed October 23, 2009.  No motion for new trial was filed.  Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed January 5, 2010.

The notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after the judgment is signed when appellant has not filed a timely motion for new trial, motion to modify the judgment, motion to reinstate, or request for findings of fact and conclusion of law.  See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1.

Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed timely.  A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by rule 26.1, but within the fifteen-day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time.  See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617-18 (Tex. 1997) (construing the predecessor to Rule 26).  However, the appellant must offer a reasonable explanation for failing to file the notice of appeal in a timely manner.  See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3, 10.5(b)(1)(C); Verburgt, 959 S.W.2d at 617–18.  Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed within the fifteen-day period provided by rule 26.3

On March 5, 2010, notification was transmitted to all parties of the Court’s intent to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).  Appellant filed no response.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Yates, Seymore, and Brown.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Verburgt v. Dorner
959 S.W.2d 615 (Texas Supreme Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ex Parte Dud Steadman Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-dud-steadman-jr-texapp-2010.