Ex Parte Donte Jayson Walker v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 14, 2021
Docket01-21-00664-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Ex Parte Donte Jayson Walker v. the State of Texas (Ex Parte Donte Jayson Walker v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Donte Jayson Walker v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Appellate case name: Ex parte Donte Jayson Walker Appellate case numbers: 01-21-00663-CR, 01-21-00664-CR, and 01-21-00665-CR Trial court case number: 1740467, 1740469, and 1740470 Trial court: 230th District Court of Harris County

Appellant, Donte Jayson Walker, has filed a notice of appeal of the trial court’s November 8, 2021 denial of his applications for a writ of habeas corpus in trial court case numbers 1740467, 1740469, and 1740470. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(b), 31. Walker’s appeals were assigned appellate case numbers 01-21-00663-CR, 01-21-00664-CR, and 01- 21-00665-CR, respectively. On December 1, 2021, the clerk’s record was filed in these appeals. The clerk’s record in each appeal includes a copy of a certification of appellant’s right of appeal, dated November 19, 2021, and signed by the Honorable Chris Morton, the presiding judge of the 230th District Court of Harris County, Walker, and Thomas B. DuPont II, Walker’s trial counsel. However, the copy of the certification of appellant’s right of appeal included in the clerk’s record in each appeal does not indicate whether appellant has the right to appeal the trial court’s November 8, 2021 orders denying his applications for writ of habeas corpus. This Court must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); Ex parte Tarango, 116 S.W.3d 201, 203 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2003, no pet.). However, the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure prohibit us from dismissing an appeal based on the lack of a valid certification when we determine that an appellant has a right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(f), 34.5(c) (2), 37.1, 44.4. Accordingly, in each trial court case number, we direct the trial court to execute a certification of appellant’s right to appeal that conforms with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d) and indicates whether appellant has the right to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a) (2), (d), 37.1. We direct the trial court clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certification of appellant’s right of appeal, signed by all required parties, and indicating whether appellant has the right to appeal. The trial court is further directed to file any other findings or recommendations the trial court deems appropriate. The supplemental clerk’s record shall be filed with this Court no later than twenty days from the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c) (2). These appeals are abated, treated as closed cases, and removed from this Court’s active docket. The appeals will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when the supplemental clerk’s record is filed with the Clerk of this Court.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ____/s/ Amparo Guerra_______  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___December 14, 2021______

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Tarango
116 S.W.3d 201 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ex Parte Donte Jayson Walker v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-donte-jayson-walker-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2021.