Ex Parte Dockum

1922 OK CR 33, 204 P. 134, 20 Okla. Crim. 468, 1922 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 85
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedFebruary 13, 1922
DocketNo. A-4105.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1922 OK CR 33 (Ex Parte Dockum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Dockum, 1922 OK CR 33, 204 P. 134, 20 Okla. Crim. 468, 1922 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 85 (Okla. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition filed on behalf of A. W. Dockum represents that he is unlawfully confined and restrained of his liberty by D. W. Griffin, superintendent of the Central State Hospital at Norman, Olda.

It is alleged that petitioner is not insane and was unlawfully committed, and is confined and restrained as an inmate of said hospital without cause.

It is not¡ alleged in said petition that an application was made to the district court of Cleveland county for writ of habeas corpus to release petitioner.

It is an invariable rule of this court, in the absence of some extreme emergency, not to entertain original applica *469 tions for writ of habeas corpus where the same has not been previously presented and the writ refused by the district court of the county where the petitioner is restrained.

It is therefore adjudged and ordered that the writ be denied, and the cause dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re McDonald
1941 OK CR 50 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1922 OK CR 33, 204 P. 134, 20 Okla. Crim. 468, 1922 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 85, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-dockum-oklacrimapp-1922.