Ex parte Doby

391 S.W.2d 732
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 23, 1965·No. No. 38229·Published

Opinion

MORRISON, Judge.

This is an original application for writ of habeas corpus. Our opinions affirming petitioner’s conviction appear in Doby v. State, 383 S.W.2d 418.

As we pointed out on motion for rehearing, the search warrant was exhibited to petitioner’s counsel, and after examination, counsel stated that he had no objection.

We held this application on our docket to await the action of the Supreme Court of the United States in Linkletter v. Walker, 85 S.Ct. 1731 (June 7, 1965) and Angelet v. Fay, 85 S.Ct. 1750 (June 7, 1965).

We have now concluded that even though petitioner was in the appellate process at the time the Supreme Court handed down Aguilar v. State of Texas, 378 U.S. 108, 84 S.Ct. 1509, 12 L.Ed.2d 723, he may not avail himself in this collateral attack of the rule therein announced because of his failure to object to the introduction of the fruits of the search at the time of trial.

The writ of habeas corpus is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex parte Doby, 391 S.W.2d 732 (Tex. 1965).

391 S.W.2d 732 (Ex parte Doby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Aguilar v. Texas
378 U.S. 108 (Supreme Court, 1964)
Linkletter v. Walker
381 U.S. 618 (Supreme Court, 1965)
Angelet v. Fay
381 U.S. 654 (Supreme Court, 1965)
Doby v. State
383 S.W.2d 418 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1964)