Ex parte Dickson

Mississippi Supreme Court

Ex parte Dickson

42 So. 233, 89 Miss. 778

Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 1906·Published

Opinion

Whitfield, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The learned counsel for relator have made a very ingenious argument, but one that cannot be maintained. The contention was perfectly covered by the reasoning in the case of Yazoo City v. Ligthcap, 82 Miss., 149 (s.c., 33 South. Rep., 949), which demonstrates the constitutionality of the amendment of the charter of the city of Vicksburg, made on 17 th day of February, 1904, in accordance with Code 1892, § 3039.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Whitfield, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The learned counsel for relator have made a very ingenious argument, but one that cannot be maintained. The contention was perfectly covered by the reasoning in the case of Yazoo City v. Ligthcap, 82 Miss., 149 (s.c., 33 South. Rep., 949), which demonstrates the constitutionality of the amendment of the charter of the city of Vicksburg, made on 17 th day of February, 1904, in accordance with Code 1892, § 3039.

Affirmed.

Ex parte Dickson, 42 So. 233, 89 Miss. 778 (Mich. 1906).

Pincite

42 So. 233 (Ex parte Dickson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.