Ex Parte Derin Keith Muller
This text of Ex Parte Derin Keith Muller (Ex Parte Derin Keith Muller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 1, 2022.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-21-00663-CR
EX PARTE DERIN KEITH MULLER
On Appeal from the 149th District Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 73524-B
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant appeals the trial court’s order denying relief pursuant to appellant’s article 11.07 application for writ of habeas corpus. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07. We do not have jurisdiction over this appeal. Only the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction in final post-conviction felony proceedings, and we have no authority to review the trial court’s order denying appellant’s post-conviction application for writ of habeas corpus. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07; In re Garcia, 363 S.W.3d 819, 822 n.4 (Tex. App.—Austin, no pet.) (“Courts of appeals have no jurisdiction over criminal-law matters pertaining to proceedings under article 11.07.”). On December 27, 2021, we informed appellant that it appears this court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal. We directed him to file a response within 21 days or the appeal would be dismissed. Appellant filed a brief on the merits, but no other response demonstrating how this court could exercise jurisdiction over this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Poissant.
Do Not Publish – Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ex Parte Derin Keith Muller, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-derin-keith-muller-texapp-2022.