Ex Parte Del Briggs

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Ex Parte Del Briggs

159 S.W.3d 926, 2004 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1977, 2004 WL 2601709

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedNovember 17, 2004

DocketWR-60515-01

StatusPublished

This text of 159 S.W.3d 926 (Ex Parte Del Briggs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex Parte Del Briggs, 159 S.W.3d 926, 2004 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1977, 2004 WL 2601709 (Tex. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Briggs has filed a motion asking this Court to set bond during the pendency of her application for a writ of habeas corpus. Article 11.65 provides in relevant part:

On making proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law jointly stipulated to by the applicant and the state, or on approving proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law made by an attorney or magistrate appointed by the court to perform that duty and jointly stipulated to by the applicant and the state, the convicting court may order the release of the applicant on bond, subject to conditions imposed by the convicting court, until the applicant is denied relief,.remanded to custody, or ordered released. 1

Because the convicting court is the proper forum for the relief she seeks, any motion seeking that relief must be filed there. Applicant’s motion is denied.

1

. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC., Art. 11.65(b)(emphasis added).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Briggs has filed a motion asking this Court to set bond during the pendency of her application for a writ of habeas corpus. Article 11.65 provides in relevant part:

On making proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law jointly stipulated to by the applicant and the state, or on approving proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law made by an attorney or magistrate appointed by the court to perform that duty and jointly stipulated to by the applicant and the state, the convicting court may order the release of the applicant on bond, subject to conditions imposed by the convicting court, until the applicant is denied relief,.remanded to custody, or ordered released. 1

Because the convicting court is the proper forum for the relief she seeks, any motion seeking that relief must be filed there. Applicant’s motion is denied.

1

. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC., Art. 11.65(b)(emphasis added).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

159 S.W.3d 926, 2004 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1977, 2004 WL 2601709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-del-briggs-texcrimapp-2004.