Ex parte Davis & Sowle
5 Cow. 33
Opinion
These parties were before the Court, who, we think, had jurisdiction over their persons for the purpose of costs.
Motion denied.
In like manner, this court sometimes give costs against one who moves for a mandamus, if the motion be opposed, though it be denied ; and therefore no canso of action be commenced. (Ex parte Root, 4 Cowen’s Rep. 548.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ex parte Davis & Sowle, 5 Cow. 33 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1825).
5 Cow. 33 (Ex parte Davis & Sowle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Burnham v. Rangeley
4 F. Cas. 775 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine, 1847)
Lowe v. The Benjamin
15 F. Cas. 1016 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania, 1847)