Home/Supreme Court/Ex parte Davis

Ex parte Davis

317 U.S. 592, 63 S. Ct. 26
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 12, 1942
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 317 U.S. 592 (Ex parte Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex parte Davis, 317 U.S. 592, 63 S. Ct. 26 (1942).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

It appears that petitioner has an application for a writ of error coram nobis pending in the Circuit Court of Vigo County, Indiana. He alleges that that court has not taken any action upon his application. It does not appear that petitioner has exhausted his remedies in the state courts to obtain a determination, which would be a reviewable judgment. The motion for leave to file a petition for writ of habeas corpus is therefore denied without prejudice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Donovan v. Delgado
339 F. Supp. 446 (D. Puerto Rico, 1971)
United States of America Ex Rel. Charles Noia, Relator-Appellant v. Edwin M. Fay, as Warden of Greenhaven Prison, State of New York
300 F.2d 345 (Second Circuit, 1962)
Curran v. Wooley
101 A.2d 303 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1953)
Darr v. Burford
339 U.S. 200 (Supreme Court, 1950)
Ex parte Abernathy
320 U.S. 219 (Supreme Court, 1943)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
317 U.S. 592, 63 S. Ct. 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-davis-scotus-1942.