Ex parte Davis
317 U.S. 592, 63 S. Ct. 26
Opinion
It appears that petitioner has an application for a writ of error coram nobis pending in the Circuit Court of Vigo County, Indiana. He alleges that that court has not taken any action upon his application. It does not appear that petitioner has exhausted his remedies in the state courts to obtain a determination, which would be a reviewable judgment. The motion for leave to file a petition for writ of habeas corpus is therefore denied without prejudice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ex parte Davis, 317 U.S. 592, 63 S. Ct. 26 (1942).
317 U.S. 592 (Ex parte Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Donovan v. Delgado
339 F. Supp. 446 (D. Puerto Rico, 1971)
United States of America Ex Rel. Charles Noia, Relator-Appellant v. Edwin M. Fay, as Warden of Greenhaven Prison, State of New York
300 F.2d 345 (Second Circuit, 1962)
Curran v. Wooley
101 A.2d 303 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1953)
Darr v. Burford
339 U.S. 200 (Supreme Court, 1950)
Ex parte Abernathy
320 U.S. 219 (Supreme Court, 1943)