Ex Parte Davis

1942 OK CR 38, 123 P.2d 300, 74 Okla. Crim. 75, 1942 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 213
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedFebruary 25, 1942
DocketNo. A-10157.
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 1942 OK CR 38 (Ex Parte Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Davis, 1942 OK CR 38, 123 P.2d 300, 74 Okla. Crim. 75, 1942 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 213 (Okla. Ct. App. 1942).

Opinion

DOYLE, J.

Petitioner, A. B. C. Davis, filed his application for a writ of habeas corpus in this court by mail, wherein it is alleged that he is unlawfully imprisoned and detained in the State Penitentiary at McAlester, by respondent, Fred Hunt, warden, under a commitment issued out of the district court of Oklahoma county, upon a judgment rendered in said court upon a verdict finding said petitioner guilty of the crime of murder.

The facts alleged in said petition are almost identical with the facts alleged in a petition by petitioner heretofore presented to this court, and which was denied. Ex parte A. B. C. Davis, 68 Okla. Cr. 29, 95 P. 2d 915. See, also, Ex parte A. B. C. Davis, 46 Okla. Cr. 117, 281 P. 1116; Ex parte A. B. C. Davis, 55 Okla. Cr. 380, 31 P. 2d 623.

A demurrer to the petition and motion to dismiss was interposed on behalf of the respondent.

Generally speaking, where an application for writ of habeas corpus has been denied, this court will not ordinarily entertain a subsequent application for a writ based on the same grounds and the same facts, or any other grounds or facts existing when the first application was made, whether presented then or not.

For the reasons stated, the demurrer to the petition is sustained and the cause is dismissed.

BAREFOOT, P. J., and JONES, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kessinger v. Raines
1964 OK CR 27 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1964)
Camplain v. State
1963 OK CR 77 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1963)
Burke v. Raines
1961 OK CR 106 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1961)
Application of Burke
1959 OK CR 42 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1959)
In Re the Habeas Corpus of Mayfield
1958 OK CR 26 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1958)
In re the Habeas Corpus of Hibbs
1958 OK CR 27 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1958)
In re the Habeas Corpus of Tidwell
1957 OK CR 102 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1957)
Ex Parte Tidwell
1950 OK CR 116 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1950)
Ex Parte Hinley
1947 OK CR 83 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1947)
In Re Cavers
1945 OK CR 126 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1945)
Ex Parte Davis
1945 OK CR 70 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1945)
In Re Edwards
1944 OK CR 85 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1944)
Denton v. Hunt
1944 OK CR 72 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1944)
Ex Parte Gray
1942 OK CR 57 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1942 OK CR 38, 123 P.2d 300, 74 Okla. Crim. 75, 1942 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-davis-oklacrimapp-1942.