Ex Parte David K. Wills

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 11, 2016
Docket13-16-00081-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Ex Parte David K. Wills (Ex Parte David K. Wills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte David K. Wills, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

NUMBERS 13-16-00081-CR & 13-16-00124-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

DAVID WILLS A/K/A DAVID K. WILLS, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 214th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.

ORDER

Before Justices Benavides, Perkes and Longoria Order Per Curiam Appellant David Wills appeals from the trial court’s denial of two pretrial

applications for writ of habeas corpus seeking reasonable bail and bond conditions. Appellant has filed a motion to “allow the appeals to proceed without the trial court’s

certifications of the defendant’s right to appeal.”

Rule 25.2(a)(2) governs the defendant's right to appeal in a criminal case:

A defendant in a criminal case has the right of appeal under Code of Criminal Procedure article 44.02 and these rules. The trial court shall enter a certification of the defendant's right of appeal in every case in which it enters a judgment of guilt or other appealable order. In a plea bargain case—that is, a case in which defendant's plea is guilty or nolo contendere and the punishment did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant—a defendant may appeal only:

(A) those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or

(B) after getting the trial court's permission to appeal.

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).

Rule 25.2(d) requires that the trial court certify whether the defendant has a right

of appeal under Rule 25.2(a)(2). Id. R. 25.2(d). Rule 25.2(a)(2), in turn, requires that

the trial court enter a certification of the defendant's right of appeal in every case in which

it enters a judgment of guilt or other appealable order. Id. R. 25.2(a)(2). The appeal

must be dismissed if a certification showing the defendant has the right of appeal has not

been made part of the record under the Rules of Appellate Procedure. Id. R. 25.2(d).

An order denying a pretrial writ of habeas corpus is an appealable order. Ex Parte

Lovings, 480 S.W.3d 106, 110 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2015, no pet. h.) (citing

Ex parte Smith, 178 S.W.3d 797, 802 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (per curiam)). Rule 25.2’s

certification requirements extend to habeas corpus proceedings. See Maydon v. State,

141 S.W.3d 851, 853 n.2 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2004, no pet.) (applying certification

requirements to appeal from denial of habeas corpus); Ex parte Tarango, 116 S.W.3d

2 201, 203 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2003, no pet.) (same). Accordingly, we deny appellant’s

motion to proceed without the trial court’s certification of the defendant’s right to appeal.

The record before us does not contain a certification of appellant’s right of appeal.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d) (“If the defendant is the appellant, the record must include the

trial court’s certification of the defendant’s right of appeal under Rule 25.2(a)(2).”). The

Clerk of this Court has contacted the trial court clerk, who has informed us that no

certification exists in the record. We therefore abate this case and instruct the trial court

to prepare and send to this Court a certification of defendant’s right of appeal. See id.

R. 25.2(a)(2); Maydon, 141 S.W.3d at 853 n.2; see also Dominguez v. State, No. 03-14-

00086-CR, 2014 WL 1285877, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Mar. 28, 2014, no pet.). The

trial court's certification shall be included in a supplemental clerk's record. The trial court

is directed to cause the supplemental clerk's record to be filed with the Clerk of this Court

within ten days of the date of this order. Should the trial court require more time to

comply with the directions of this Court, it shall request an extension prior to the expiration

of this deadline.

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 11th day of April, 2016.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Russell v. Bray
116 S.W.3d 1 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2003)
Maydon v. State
141 S.W.3d 851 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2004)
Ex Parte Smith
178 S.W.3d 797 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)
EX PARTE Stacey LOVINGS
480 S.W.3d 106 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ex Parte David K. Wills, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-david-k-wills-texapp-2016.