Ex Parte Davenport

814 So. 2d 277, 2001 Ala. LEXIS 346, 2001 WL 1073481
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided September 14, 2001·No. 1000352·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

HARWOOD, Justice.

The writ of certiorari is quashed. In quashing the writ, we note that the Court of Civil Appeals reversed the judgment entered by the trial court insofar as it found James D. Davenport in criminal contempt, and expressly noted that the judgment insofar as it found him in civil contempt was not challenged on appeal. Davenport v. Hood, 814 So.2d 268 (Ala.Civ.App.2000). This Court does not wish to be understood as approving of all of the rationale or statements of law in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals relating to civil contempt. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT QUASHED.

MOORE, C.J., and HOUSTON, SEE, LYONS, BROWN, JOHNSTONE, WOODALL, and STUART, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex Parte Davenport, 814 So. 2d 277, 2001 Ala. LEXIS 346, 2001 WL 1073481 (Ala. 2001).

814 So. 2d 277 (Ex Parte Davenport) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

T.L.D. v. C.G.
849 So. 2d 200 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2002)