Ex parte Dauthereau

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Ex parte Dauthereau

4 S.C.L. 459

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided January 15, 1811·Published

Opinion

Nott, J.,

declared the opinion of the whole court, that the decision was correct; A. A. 1787. The Ordinaries in a case like the present, have concurrent jurisdiction. It is so-declared by a former act of assembly. The granting administration by any one, concludes the other. As to the right of revocation, in was pro. perly exercised in the first instance, and the second grant of administration was legal and proper. No ground has been shewn why the last grant should be repealed.

Motion rejected.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nott, J.,

declared the opinion of the whole court, that the decision was correct; A. A. 1787. The Ordinaries in a case like the present, have concurrent jurisdiction. It is so-declared by a former act of assembly. The granting administration by any one, concludes the other. As to the right of revocation, in was pro. perly exercised in the first instance, and the second grant of administration was legal and proper. No ground has been shewn why the last grant should be repealed.

Motion rejected.

Ex parte Dauthereau, 4 S.C.L. 459 (S.C. 1811).

Pincite

4 S.C.L. 459 (Ex parte Dauthereau) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.