Ex parte Dauthereau

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Ex parte Dauthereau

4 S.C.L. 459

DecidedJanuary 15, 1811

StatusPublished

This text of 4 S.C.L. 459 (Ex parte Dauthereau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex parte Dauthereau, 4 S.C.L. 459 (S.C. 1811).

Pincite

Opinion

Nott, J.,

declared the opinion of the whole court, that the decision was correct; A. A. 1787. The Ordinaries in a case like the present, have concurrent jurisdiction. It is so-declared by a former act of assembly. The granting administration by any one, concludes the other. As to the right of revocation, in was pro. perly exercised in the first instance, and the second grant of administration was legal and proper. No ground has been shewn why the last grant should be repealed.

Motion rejected.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nott, J.,

declared the opinion of the whole court, that the decision was correct; A. A. 1787. The Ordinaries in a case like the present, have concurrent jurisdiction. It is so-declared by a former act of assembly. The granting administration by any one, concludes the other. As to the right of revocation, in was pro. perly exercised in the first instance, and the second grant of administration was legal and proper. No ground has been shewn why the last grant should be repealed.

Motion rejected.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 S.C.L. 459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-dauthereau-sc-1811.